Pages Navigation Menu

ON-LINE MAGAZINE & WEB SITE - SCROLL DOWN FOR NEWS

☛ NCHA creates Practice Pen Attendants position 10-11-18

Posted by on Oct 11, 2018 in BREAKING NEWS, COW HORSE NEWS, CUTTING NEWS, HORSE ORGANIZATIONS, INDUSTRY NEWS, MAJOR EVENTS, WHO, WHAT & WHERE | 0 comments

NCHA CREATES A POSITION FOR PRACTICE PEN ATTENDANTS

 

ATTENDANTS WILL MONITOR PRACTICE PENS AT ALL NCHA TRIPLE CROWN EVENTS AND EASTERN/WESTERN NATIONAL SHOWS

 

By Glory Ann Kurtz
Oct. 11, 2018

 

Show secretaries are receiving a new Practice Pen Attendant position that has been created by the NCHA, along with an Independent Contractor Agreement. Both documents outline what will be expected of anyone who is employed by the NCHA to monitor the practice pens at all NCHA Triple Crown events, as well as the Eastern and Western National Shows.

 

According to the NCHA, Practice Pen attendants will report to the Director of Shows, with directions and instructions coming from the Show Department. Funds received by the attendants will be reconciled on a daily basis and deposited by them, along with a report of reconciliation.

 

The Practice Pen attendant will become proficient with the use of Faster Cut software and will use the software at all times for recording of practice-pen activity.  The attendant will comply with all cash-handling processes as outlined by NCHA, including bonding practices.

 

The Practice Pen attendant will also be required to track all pertinent information for each practice pen transaction, including: payment method, payment amount, name of trainer, name of rider, name of horse and date and time.  The attendant will also be required to provide a report after each event, reconciling the report to the amount of cash turned into the Accounting Department.  He or she will also be required to forward to Accounting, all information regarding trainers/riders.

 

The Practice Pen attendant will also be required to scan all practice pen reports or other practice pen documents to be uploaded into NCHA’s approved document management system. They can either bring the scanned document to the NCHA or email it to the NCHA Show Department.

 

The money bag and all deposits from each show will be put into the safe every night.

 

NCHA Independent Contractor agreement18

 

Read More

☛ The latest NCHA news regarding Ed Dufurrena

Posted by on Sep 28, 2018 in BREAKING NEWS, COW HORSE NEWS, CUTTING NEWS, HORSE ORGANIZATIONS, WHO, WHAT & WHERE | 3 comments

THE LATEST NEWS ON NCHA AND ED DUFURRENA

Sept. 28, 2018

 

The following is what I heard is happening with Ed Dufurrena, who can’t seem to quit breaking the rules so the NCHA just keeps making new rules.

 

  1. A new rule that NCHA EC just passed states: Any suspended member, including Ed Dufurrena, will now not be allowed to attend any NCHA event in any capacity. 

 

  1. Executive Committee members were each asked to turn in two names of persons that they want to be on a new grievance committee to hear the two complaints that have been filed on Ed and Brandon for violating suspension. No one from the old committee that heard the last Ed case will be allowed on this new formed committee.

 

  1. My understanding is that there is still a 5-10 day period before these cases will go forward and be heard.

 

  1. MCHA was the affiliate that filed the second complaint at the Whitesboro, Texas, show.
  1. The Finance committee had a long meeting on the 26th. As far as the MERP funds from the state are concerned an EC member stated … “It’s not state money they are waiting for …it is money from the city of Ft. Worth.
Read More

☛ A letter from a concerned Youth Parent

Posted by on Sep 26, 2018 in BREAKING NEWS, COW HORSE NEWS, CUTTING NEWS, HORSE ORGANIZATIONS, REINING NEWS, WHO, WHAT & WHERE | 0 comments

 

A LETTER FROM A CONCERNED NCHA YOUTH PARENT

Date Received: Sept. 26, 2018

The following letter was received from a concerned Youth parent regarding the NCHA Scholarship Selection Committee’s action regarding both chairs of the committee having a “conflict of interest.”

 

From Youth Parent

Read More

☛ A letter to Ron Pietrafeso from a past Executive Board member

Posted by on Sep 26, 2018 in BREAKING NEWS, COW HORSE NEWS, CUTTING NEWS, HORSE ORGANIZATIONS, INDUSTRY NEWS, REINING NEWS, WHO, WHAT & WHERE | 0 comments

A LETTER TO RON PIETRAFESO FROM A PAST EXECUTIVE BOARD MEMBER

Sept. 26, 2018

Today I received a letter from a past Executive Board member saying, “I am sending this letter to you in hopes that you will publish it on your website. Hopefully I can bring a few things to light and hope that some questions get answered by those in charge of our association. Sorry for not sending this through email but to tell the truth I’m not very good at email and social media. Thank you.

Dufurrena letter

 

Read More

☛ NCHA has received $5.2 million from State in past two years 9-26-18

Posted by on Sep 26, 2018 in BREAKING NEWS, COW HORSE NEWS, CUTTING NEWS, HORSE ORGANIZATIONS, REINING NEWS, WHO, WHAT & WHERE | 1 comment

NCHA HAS ACTUALLY RECEIVED OVER $5.2 MILLION FROM THE STATE OF TEXAS IN PAST TWO YEARS

 

A TOTAL OF $530,300 HAS ALSO BEEN RECEIVED THIS YEAR

 

By Glory Ann Kurtz
Sept. 26, 2018
On Sept. 24,  I sent out a newsletter regarding the money NCHA was receiving from the State of Texas. The last two paragraphs of the article were wrong and for that I apologize. THE NCHA HAS BEEN GETTING MONEY FROM THE STATE OF TEXAS FOR THE PAST THREE YEARS.

 

For several years, I haven’t looked up State of Texas funds that repay associations for their events that bring people into the city of Fort Worth and State of Texas. I didn’t realize that they had renamed the METF to the MERP (Major Event Repayment Program) and it is no longer on the same document that most of the other non-profits are located. A couple of my readers realized what had happened and directed me to the MERP page published by the State.  I really appreciate their help.

 

Before I published the article, I called the Governor’s office yesterday to find out the reason why the NCHA wasn’t listed on the METF list; however, to date, they still haven’t returned my call. I also placed a call to Lewis Wray, but he also has ignored my request for a call.

 

THE MERP AND NCHA:

According to the MERP charts, over the past three years, the NCHA has received over $5.2 million from the MERP program of the State of Texas for their three major events: The NCHA Futurity that is held with the NCHA World Finals, the NCHA Summer Spectacular and the NCHA Super Stakes.

 

During 2016, they received $2,562,928 for the 2015 NCHA Summer Spectacular and NCHA Futurity, as well as the 2016 NCHA Summer Spectacular and NCHA Super Stakes.

 

In 2017, they received a total of $2,169,640 for the 2017 NCHA Super Stakes ($725,650) and $1,383,989 for the 2016 Futurity and World Show.

 

So far in 2018, they have received $530,300 for the 2017 NCHA Summer Spectacular. In total for the past three years, they have received $5,262,868 from the MERP program from the State of Texas.

MERP money 2017-2018

 

 

 

Read More

☛ NCHA Suspension and Appeal Guidelines Getting An Overhaul 9-21-18

Posted by on Sep 21, 2018 in BREAKING NEWS, COW HORSE NEWS, CUTTING NEWS, FROM THE EDITOR, HORSE LAWSUITS, HORSE ORGANIZATIONS, INDUSTRY NEWS, LAWSUITS & INDICTMENTS, WHO, WHAT & WHERE | 10 comments

NCHA SUSPENSION AND APPEAL GUIDELINES GETTING AN OVERHAUL

 

STANDING RULE 37 AND 38 UPDATED FOLLOWING DUFURRENA/VOGEL CASE

 

By Glory Ann Kurtz
Sept. 21, 2018

According to an interesting e-mail that I received, following the Dufurrena/Vogel situation I previously wrote about, the NCHA is revising Standing Rule 37 and 38, which cover members who have done something that places them on probation or suspends them from the NCHA by the Grievance Committee, Amateur, Non-Pro Review Committee, Medication Review Committee or any other committee authorized by NCHA for violating any rule.

 

Following are the major parts of the new suspension and appeal guidelines:

 

Rule 37: Non-members involved in NCHA rule violations may also be denied privileges of the Association for “violation of or assisting in the violation of NCHA rules.”  When the NCHA rule in question contains specific provisions concerning disciplinary actions or burdens of proof, any disciplinary action taken by an initial Hearing Committee, the Executive Committee or an Appeal Committee should be consistent with that provision.

 

Any member can file a complaint regarding any alleged violation of NCHA rules by submitting the complaint in writing to the NCHA Executive Director (ED), signed or identified by the person filing the complaint, and sent with a check or credit card payment for $50, payable to the NCHA, unless the person filing the complaint is an NCHA Director, a class representative, show management or a judge. Anonymous complaints will not be accepted, investigated or acted on by the NCHA, with the exception if a complaint is reporting a violation of the Zero Tolerance policy or for a complaint submitted by an NCHA Director, a class representative, show management or a judge. Anonymous complaints will not be accepted, investigated or acted on by the NCHA.

 

A complaint must be filed, postmarked, faxed, emailed or hand-delivered within seven (7) days of the closing date of the show involved or within seven (7) days of the alleged rule violations. The timing for filing a complaint alleging a violation of the Zero Tolerance Policy is contained in Standing Rule 35.6. No complaint is required regarding a member’s competitive status (non-pro or amateur rules) or for violation of the NCHA Medication and Drug Rules.

 

The ED will refer complaints to (1) Grievance, (2) Medication Review, (3) Non-Pro Amateur, (4) or any other hearing or review committee. A quorum of an initial hearing committee will consist of three members with one being elected chairman.

 

The NCHA will notify the alleged violator in writing of the complaint and alleged action being investigated, each NCHA rule(s) potentially violated, the disciplinary actions applicable to the alleged violation and request that the violator file a written election with the ED to contest or not contest the alleged violation within 10 business days. If not received in that timeframe the case will be deemed not contested.

 

Initial Hearing:

The initial Hearing Committee shall schedule a hearing not less than 15 days‘ notice of the hearing date but not less than five business days notice of the hearing date. The alleged violator and NCHA shall exchange all proposed documents and evidence to be considered in the hearing no less than three days prior to the hearing. Legal counsel for NCHA and the alleged violator may appear and participate in the evidentiary position of the hearing. The hearing committee shall deliberate in private and shall render a decision in contested matters by majority vote and shall notify the EC of the decision in writing. The initial Hearing Committee will only be required to note in its report the NCHA rule(s) violated and will not be required to provide a detailed reason or opinion for its decision.

 

The Medication Review Committee shall consider potential violations of the Medication and Drug Rules and guidelines. Potential disciplinary actions for proceedings relating to alleged violations are contained in Rule 35A.7. The alleged violator bears the burden of proof to establish that he or she has NOT administered any drug or medication in violation of the NCHA Medication and Drug rules.

 

The Non-Professional Amateur Review Committee shall initially consider all violations of the NP and Amateur rules. The potential disciplinary actions for proceedings relating to alleged violations are in rules 50-51. The alleged violator bears the burden to establish entitlement to hold NP and/or Amateur status.

 

The Grievance Committee (GC) shall initially consider all violations of rules relating to alleged violations of NCHA Zero Tolerance Policy (35A) alleging improper conduct toward judges and monitors (35B), alleged improper conduct by and between members (35C) and alleged violations of other rules that are not considered by the Medication Review Committee, the Non-Pro Amateur Review Committee or Executive Committee.

 

For matters for which the rule allegedly violated contains suggested disciplinary action, the GC should consult those provisions in connection with discipline to be assessed for such rule violations. In cases where the rule allegedly violated does not contain suggested disciplinary action, the GC should consult the following general guidelines:  (i) First Offense: fine, probation or both. A first offense will be removed from a member’s record if that member has no further infractions for two years after the first offense is committed. (ii) Second offense within 2 years of first offense (a) increased fine (b) increased probation, (c) suspension or all of the foregoing. (iii) Additional offenses within 2 years will be dealt with severely, including heavy fines, lengthy probation and suspension will be increased as deemed appropriate by the committee.

 

Effects of Membership Probation and Suspension: Probation will be for a length of time decided by appropriate committee and also set a term of suspension imposed in the event the probation is violated. The term of suspension shall only become effective upon the probated member’s violation of the terms of his probation. In the event suspension is imposed for subsequent rule violation(s), the balance of the probated suspension shall begin on the day after the suspension for the subsequent rule violation s completely served.

Any membership Suspension that went into effect on or before Aug. 21, 2018 will not be allowed to participate in any way (owner, agent of horse, contestant, helper mounted  or on foot, in an NCHA approved or sponsored cutting horse contest. A suspended person can only attend an NCHA approved or sponsored cutting horse contest as a spectator seated in the stands. Any horse owned or controlled in whole or part by a suspended person will not be allowed to enter or compete in an NCHA approved or sponsored cutting. In the event a suspended person violates this rule, an additional six months will be added to his suspension. The rider of any horse ineligible to enter or compete in an NCHA-approved or sponsored cutting horse contest under this rule will be subject to a six-month membership suspension.

 

Membership Suspensions that went into effect after August 21, 2018:

Any person who has had their membership suspended, where suspension commences after August 21, 2018, will not be allowed in the premises of an NCHA approved or sponsored cutting contest. “Premises” include all show arenas, practice pens, loping arenas, sales barns, exhibit halls, trade shows and all other parts of the show grounds.

Any horse owned or controlled in whole or part by a suspended person or in which the suspended person holds any future rights of any kind, will not be allowed to enter, compete or transfer existing entries in an NCHA-approved or sponsored cutting horse contest. This includes horses owned by a corporation, partnership or any entity in which the suspended member has any ownership interest. If a suspended person violates this rule, an additional six (6) months will be added to his suspension. The rider of any horse in any NCHA approved or sponsored horse contest which is ineligible to enter or compete under this rule will be subject to six-month membership suspension.

 

Failure to timely pay fine:  When a member is assed a fine in addition to a suspension and/or probation, as a result of a committee finding made after Aug. 21, 2018, such fine must be paid in full within 15 days after the fine is assessed. In the event the fine is not paid in full in that timeframe, the corresponding suspension and/or probation will be extended by a period equal to the number of days over 15 that it takes for the member to pay to fine in full.

 

Transfer of horses owned by suspended member: This applies to all membership suspensions that went into effect after Aug. 21, 2018. A horse owned by a suspended member at the time of his/her suspension that is sold, gifted or for which ownership is otherwise transferred to an immediate family member, or that is sold, gifted or for which ownership is otherwise transferred to any corporation, partnership or any other entity of any kind in which the suspended member has any present or future ownership interest will not be allowed to show in any NCHA approved or produced event during the term of that member’s suspension. In the event the NCHA questions the legitimacy of a transfer made by a suspended person during his/her suspension, the suspended person shall bear the burden of proof to establish the legitimacy of the transfer.

 

Suspension by other associations: Every person suspended by the AQHA or APHA for unsportsmanlike conduct at a show or contest or for inhumane treatment of horses, shall stand suspended by the NCA upon official notification to this Ass’n from the AQHA or the APHA of any such disciplinary action which has become final and  non-appealable. The NCHA may honor the disciplinary actions of its affiliate organizations when supplied with satisfactory evidence that the person so disciplined has been given a full and impartial hearing by the affiliate organization involved; however, any action taken by an affiliate will not limit any authority of jurisdiction of the NCHA.

 

Publication of Findings:When disciplinary action is taken the results will be published in the Cutting Horse Chatter. Also, all decisions a final and binding unless subsequently overturned by an appeal committee under NCHA Standing Rule 38.

 

Rule 38: Appeal Guidelines:

Appeal Prerequisites: (a) Anyone found in violation of any NCHA rule by an Initial Hearing Committee, is entitled to appeal so long as (1) written notice of such request for appeal by each person appealing the ruling is received by the NCHA ED within 21 days of the date of the letter notifying the person of such action taken by the Initial hearing Committee and (2) an appeal fee as required by section (b) below is also received by the NCHA ED within the 21-day period.

 

(b) The appeal fee is $6,000 per person appealing that decision. For cases in which the Initial Hearing Committee has assessed a suspension of membership or competitive status, the appealing party shall have the right to request an expedited appeal as described in section (c) below. The appeal fee for an expedited appeal is $10,000 for each person filing an expedited appeal of the decision of an Initial hearing Committee. Appeal fees will not be refunded unless all findings of the initial Hearing Committee are completely overturned by an Appeal Committee.

 

(c) In the case of a non-expedited appeal, the appealing member(s) shall be given not less than 15 days notice of a time and place for appeal hearing to be heard by the EC or by an Appeal Committee appointed by the NCHA President. In cases of an expedited appeal, the appealing member(s) shall be entitled to an appeal hearing no more than five business days after the expedited appeal is perfected.

 

Appeal Proceedings: (a) An appeal is a “de  novo” proceeding that could result in a new finding concerning whether or not there was a violation of any NCHA rule(s) and either an affirmation, enhancement or decrease in the disciplinary action taken by the Initial Hearing Committee. (b) Eight members of the Executive Committee shall constitute a quorum. (c) The NCHA President may appoint a Special Appeal Hearing Committee  (the “Appeal Committee”) to conduct any appeal hearing or disciplinary actions. This Committee shall have a minimum of five members and a maximum of nine. Each member must be a member in good standing of the NCHA. Five members of the Appeal Committee members shall constitute a quorum for hearing an appeal. (d) No continuance of an appeal hearing shall be granted unless a written request is received by the ED at least 7 days prior to the hearing and good cause is shown as determined at the sole discretion of the President or Chairman of the Appeal Committee. (e) At the hearing the appealing member shall have the opportunity to be heard, be represented by legal counsel, present evidence in his/her own behalf and to hear and refute any evidence offered against them. (g) The decision of the EC or Appeal Committee in an appeal proceeding under this rule shall be final and binding on all parties. The committee hearing an appeal shall only be required to note in its report the NCHA rule(s) it found were violated and shall not be required to provide a detailed reasoned option for its decision. (h) When disciplinary action is taken, the results in probation or suspension, the person’s name, the rule violated, and the disciplinary action taken will be published in the Cutting Horse Chatter.

 

From the Editor:

As a member of the NCHA for close to 20 years, I was sued at one time by the NCHA for asking for Rick Ivey’s salary and refusing to sign a non-disclosure form to prevent my dissemination of the information I was provided. (They dropped the suit when I told them I didn’t need his salary, I found it out another way.) As an investigative journalist and the owner of this website, my only remark about the above Guidelines is that they should include: “Any NCHA member who loses a lawsuit filed by another NCHA member regarding the other member’s actions, including taking advantage of the elderly, providing false or erroneous invoices to an NCHA member by a trainer, running an illegal business or training operation within the confines of the NCHA as defined by the State of Organization or Operation, providing false documentation to an NCHA committee during an appeal or suspension committee hearing, the loss of a customer’s horse due to abuse by the trainer or the trainer’s agent or assign including, but not limited to, employees, contractors or subcontractors, or charging exorbitant fees for other services, such as double dipping customers for travel or hauling expenses, should receive a lifetime suspension, without preferential treatment or exception.”

 

The trainers are basically unregulated by the above problems.  I hear these complaints all the time and instigating these rules could bring back some of the many well-heeled members who have left the NCHA…..and get rid of some the bad actors or unscrupulous trainers contributing to the demise of the membership numbers.

Glory Ann Kurtz

Read More